# ICT Subcontracting Oversight (DORA)

> Draft the ICT subcontracting oversight framework per DORA and RTS 2025/0532, covering conditions for sub-outsourcing critical functions, notification and approval processes, concentration risk, and monitoring.



Tags: DORA, Subcontracting, ICT Outsourcing, Third-Party Risk, EU Regulation, Financial Services


## Example Prompts

- Assess sub-outsourcing risks in our cloud provider's supply chain
- Draft the sub-outsourcing notification and approval process
- Evaluate ICT concentration risk from shared sub-contractors
- Create the contractual flow-down requirements for sub-outsourcing

URL: https://rakenne.app/skills/dora-subcontracting-oversight/index.md

Try this skill: https://rakenne.app/a/?skill=dora-subcontracting-oversight



## Overview

Draft the ICT subcontracting oversight framework per DORA and RTS 2025/0532, covering conditions for sub-outsourcing critical functions, notification and approval processes, concentration risk, and monitoring.

## What It Covers

- **RTS 2025/0532 conditions assessment** -- prior notification, right to object, TPP due diligence on sub-contractors, maintained service quality, no increased risk, contract flow-downs, and supervisory access
- **Sub-outsourcing inventory** -- map each ICT TPP's sub-contractors with jurisdiction, services, data processing locations, chain depth, and criticality classification
- **Concentration risk analysis** -- shared sub-contractors across multiple TPPs, geographic concentration, criticality cascades, single points of failure, and sectoral concentration
- **Monitoring framework** -- KPI/KRI cascade for sub-outsourced services, audit rights flow-down, incident reporting chain, periodic review, and Information Register updates
- **Approval and notification process** -- internal governance for sub-outsourcing decisions, objection conditions, escalation procedures, termination triggers, and response timelines
- **Contractual flow-downs** -- Art. 30 equivalent provisions for sub-outsourcing contracts (SLAs, data protection, audit rights, exit assistance, incident notification, security requirements)
- **Governance** -- roles and responsibilities, management body reporting, three lines of defense alignment, and competent authority reporting

## Example Conversation

> **You:** Our main cloud provider (TechCloud) wants to sub-outsource database hosting to a third party in Singapore. We're a credit institution and that database supports our core banking platform, which is a critical function. Can you help us assess this?
>
> **Agent:** I'll build the sub-outsourcing oversight assessment. First, let me gather context. Can you confirm: (1) your proportionality tier, (2) your competent authority, and (3) whether TechCloud has provided a formal notification with the sub-contractor's identity, jurisdiction, services, and due diligence results?
>
> **You:** We're a Tier 1 credit institution supervised by BaFin. TechCloud sent a notification naming "DataHost SG Pte Ltd" in Singapore, covering managed PostgreSQL hosting. They included a SOC 2 Type II report but no financial viability data. We have 45 days to respond.
>
> **Agent:** I've created the sub-outsourcing inventory entry and started the RTS 2025/0532 conditions assessment. Key findings so far: (1) prior notification is present but incomplete -- missing financial viability data and data processing locations; (2) Singapore is a third country, so we need to verify supervisory access and GDPR Chapter V compliance; (3) this sub-outsourcing supports a critical function, so management body approval is required under Art. 28(2). Let me also check concentration risk -- do any of your other ICT TPPs use DataHost SG or infrastructure in the same Singapore data center region?
>
> **You:** Actually, our payment processor also uses a Singapore-based sub-contractor for transaction logging. I'm not sure if it's the same entity.
>
> **Agent:** That's a potential geographic concentration risk. I'll flag it in the concentration risk section and recommend you verify whether the two sub-contractors share infrastructure. I'm now drafting the full framework with the conditions assessment, the notification response process, and the contractual flow-down checklist. I'll also map the criticality cascade: core banking depends on TechCloud, which would depend on DataHost SG for database hosting -- a failure there propagates directly to the critical function.
>
> **Agent:** Running `dora_subcontracting_checker` against the framework...
>
> **Agent:** The checker found 2 errors: (1) TPP due diligence is incomplete -- financial viability assessment missing; (2) supervisory access for the Singapore jurisdiction is not yet confirmed. I've added these to the objection grounds section. I recommend requesting the missing due diligence from TechCloud before the 45-day window closes, and obtaining a legal opinion on BaFin's ability to exercise audit rights in Singapore.

## Sample Output Excerpt

Below is a representative excerpt from a generated ICT subcontracting oversight framework document.

---

## 1. Executive Summary

This framework governs the oversight of ICT sub-outsourcing arrangements for [Entity Name], a Tier 1 credit institution supervised by BaFin, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/0532.

## 3. Sub-Outsourcing Inventory

| TPP | Sub-Contractor | Jurisdiction | Services | Critical Function | Chain Depth | Data Locations |
|-----|---------------|-------------|----------|-------------------|-------------|----------------|
| TechCloud GmbH | DataHost SG Pte Ltd | Singapore | Managed PostgreSQL hosting | Yes -- Core banking | 1 | Singapore (SG-1, SG-2) |
| PayFlow Ltd | TxLog Asia Pte Ltd | Singapore | Transaction logging | Yes -- Payment processing | 1 | Singapore (SG-3) |

## 4. RTS 2025/0532 Conditions Assessment

### 4.1 Prior Notification

| Condition | Status | Finding |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Notification received before sub-outsourcing takes effect | Met | Notification received 2025-06-01; planned commencement 2025-07-15 |
| Sub-contractor identity and corporate structure | Met | DataHost SG Pte Ltd, subsidiary of DataHost Holdings (Cayman Islands) |
| Jurisdiction of service delivery | Met | Singapore |
| Due diligence results included | Partial | SOC 2 Type II provided; financial viability assessment missing |
| Data processing locations specified | Not met | Notification references "Singapore" generically; specific data center locations not provided |

### 4.2 Right to Object

The contractual right to object is exercisable within 45 calendar days of notification. Grounds for objection identified:

1. **Incomplete due diligence**: Financial viability assessment not provided (RTS 2025/0532 condition 3)
2. **Third-country supervisory access**: No confirmation that Singapore jurisdiction permits BaFin audit and inspection rights (RTS 2025/0532 condition 7)
3. **Geographic concentration**: Combined with TxLog Asia arrangement, creates concentration in Singapore region

## 5. Concentration Risk Assessment

### 5.1 Shared Sub-Contractors

No shared sub-contractor entity identified across TPPs. However, TechCloud and PayFlow both have sub-contractors operating in Singapore, creating **geographic concentration risk**.

### 5.2 Criticality Cascade

```
Core Banking (Critical Function)
  --> TechCloud GmbH (Primary TPP)
    --> DataHost SG Pte Ltd (Sub-contractor, Singapore)
      Impact: Database unavailability = core banking outage
      RTO requirement: 4 hours
      Sub-contractor RTO: Unknown -- must be contractually defined
```

<!-- /excerpt -->

## Extension Tools

**`dora_subcontracting_checker`** validates that the subcontracting oversight framework JSON is complete against all RTS 2025/0532 requirements.

The checker evaluates seven mandatory sections:

- **Entity profile** -- entity type, proportionality tier, and competent authority must be present
- **Sub-outsourcing inventory** -- all arrangements must include sub-contractor jurisdiction and criticality classification; missing jurisdiction or criticality flags a WARNING
- **Conditions assessment** -- each of the seven RTS 2025/0532 conditions is checked individually: prior notification, right to object, TPP due diligence, maintained service quality, no increased risk, contract flow-downs, and supervisory access; each missing condition is an ERROR
- **Concentration risk** -- shared sub-contractors, geographic concentration, criticality cascade, and mitigation strategies are required (ERROR if missing); single points of failure and sectoral concentration are recommended (WARNING if missing)
- **Monitoring framework** -- TPP supervision obligation, audit rights flow-down, and incident reporting chain are required; KPI/KRI cascade, periodic review, and Information Register updates are recommended
- **Approval process** -- approval authority, notification assessment, and objection conditions are required; escalation procedures, termination triggers, and response timelines are recommended
- **Contractual flow-downs** -- service description, data protection, audit rights (Art. 30(3)(e)), exit assistance, incident notification, cooperation with authorities, and security requirements are required; termination rights and further sub-outsourcing conditions are recommended
- **Governance** -- roles and responsibilities plus management body reporting (Art. 28(2)) are required; three lines alignment, competent authority reporting, and record-keeping are recommended

Run the checker after building the framework structure. Missing mandatory items appear as ERRORs; incomplete but recommended items appear as WARNINGs.

## Getting Started

Add your source materials to the project workspace -- for example, your current ICT third-party contracts, the Information Register extract (Art. 28(3)), any TPP sub-outsourcing notifications you have received, and known sub-contractor details. Then activate the *ICT Subcontracting Oversight (DORA)* skill. The agent will guide you through mapping sub-outsourcing arrangements, assessing RTS 2025/0532 conditions, evaluating concentration risk, and producing the complete oversight framework document.



---

Back to [Skill Library](https://rakenne.app/skills/index.md)
