PMBOK Cost Management
Get Started with This SkillOverview
The PMBOK Cost Management skill supports the elaboration of documents for the Cost Management knowledge area — planning, estimating, budgeting, financing, and controlling costs so the project is completed within the approved budget. It covers cost management plans defining estimation methodology and EVM rules, cost estimates using analogous, parametric, bottom-up, or three-point techniques, basis of estimates documenting assumptions and confidence levels, project budgets with contingency and management reserves, time-phased cost baselines, and Earned Value Management performance reports with full metric calculations (PV, EV, AC, CV, SV, CPI, SPI, EAC, ETC, VAC, TCPI).
Getting Started
Upload your WBS, resource rates, or vendor quotes to the workspace and activate the PMBOK Cost Management skill. The agent will ask about the estimation technique, currency, and reserve policies, then build estimates tied to WBS work packages. For Earned Value reporting, provide current PV, EV, and AC data — the agent calculates all metrics, shows formulas, interprets trends, and recommends corrective actions.
Example Conversation
Below is an example of a typical session producing an Earned Value cost performance report at the midpoint of a software project.
You: I need a cost performance report for our mobile app project at the end of Month 6 (of 12). Here’s the data: BAC = $1,200,000. Planned Value (cumulative): $620,000. Earned Value (cumulative): $540,000. Actual Cost (cumulative): $610,000. We’ve completed 45% of the work. Can you calculate all EVM metrics and tell me what’s going on?
Agent: Here’s the Earned Value analysis for Month 6:
Variances:
- CV = EV - AC = $540,000 - $610,000 = -$70,000 (over budget)
- SV = EV - PV = $540,000 - $620,000 = -$80,000 (behind schedule)
Performance Indices:
- CPI = EV / AC = $540,000 / $610,000 = 0.89 (spending $1.13 for every $1 of value earned)
- SPI = EV / PV = $540,000 / $620,000 = 0.87 (progressing at 87% of planned rate)
Forecasts:
- EAC (typical) = BAC / CPI = $1,200,000 / 0.89 = $1,348,315
- EAC (atypical) = AC + (BAC - EV) = $610,000 + $660,000 = $1,270,000
- ETC = EAC - AC = $738,315 (if current performance continues)
- VAC = BAC - EAC = -$148,315
- TCPI (to meet BAC) = (BAC - EV) / (BAC - AC) = $660,000 / $590,000 = 1.12
Interpretation: The project is both over budget and behind schedule. With a TCPI of 1.12, you would need to perform the remaining work at 112% cost efficiency — a significant improvement over current performance. I recommend three corrective actions: (1) root-cause analysis of the cost variance, (2) evaluate scope reduction or fast-tracking opportunities, and (3) consider requesting a revised budget (EAC) of $1,350,000 with justification to the Change Control Board.
The full report with formulas, trend charts description, and corrective action plan is saved.
Document Excerpt
Below is a representative excerpt from an Earned Value cost performance report drafted with the skill.
Cost Performance Report — Excerpt
Project: Mobile Banking App v2.0 Reporting Period: Month 6 of 12 Currency: USD
Earned Value Summary
| Metric | Formula | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budget at Completion (BAC) | — | $1,200,000 | Baseline |
| Planned Value (PV) | Cumulative planned spend | $620,000 | — |
| Earned Value (EV) | % complete × BAC | $540,000 | — |
| Actual Cost (AC) | Cumulative actual spend | $610,000 | — |
Variance Analysis
| Metric | Formula | Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Variance (CV) | EV - AC | -$70,000 | Over budget by $70K |
| Schedule Variance (SV) | EV - PV | -$80,000 | Behind schedule by $80K worth of work |
| Cost Performance Index (CPI) | EV / AC | 0.89 | Earning $0.89 per $1 spent |
| Schedule Performance Index (SPI) | EV / PV | 0.87 | Completing 87% of planned work per period |
Forecasts
| Forecast | Formula | Value | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAC (typical) | BAC / CPI | $1,348,315 | Current cost performance continues |
| EAC (atypical) | AC + (BAC - EV) | $1,270,000 | Variance was one-time; future work at planned rate |
| EAC (combined) | AC + (BAC - EV) / (CPI × SPI) | $1,461,872 | Both cost and schedule trends continue |
| ETC | EAC - AC | $738,315 | Based on typical EAC |
| VAC | BAC - EAC | -$148,315 | Expected budget overrun |
| TCPI (BAC) | (BAC - EV) / (BAC - AC) | 1.12 | Required efficiency to finish within BAC |
Corrective Actions
| # | Action | Owner | Deadline | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conduct root-cause analysis of $70K cost overrun — focus on contractor overtime in Sprint 4–6 | PM / Finance | Week 26 | Identify whether overrun is systemic or isolated |
| 2 | Re-negotiate contractor rates or reduce scope of non-critical features (push notifications, analytics dashboard) | PM / Sponsor | Week 27 | Potential savings of $80K–$120K |
| 3 | Submit EAC revision ($1,350,000) to Change Control Board with trend analysis | PM | Week 28 | Formal budget re-baseline if approved |
This excerpt is illustrative. Final content must reflect the specific project’s financial data, organizational policies, and current EVM standards.