Browse Skills

State Claims Risk Management

    Get Started with This Skill

    Overview

    Draft and validate Risk Management reports for state-insured entities (hospitals, prisons, delegated state authorities) in Ireland under the State Claims Agency (SCA) / NTMA. The skill ensures expected sections (executive summary, scope, incidents/trends, mitigation, compliance), tags Protected Disclosure and Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) content for appropriate handling, and aligns with statutory incident reporting via NIMS. For incident-only reports intended for NIMS upload, use the nims_report_standardizer skill to format; this skill focuses on full Risk Management reports.

    Example

    You: We need a quarterly Risk Management report for our hospital for the board. This quarter we had 14 slips, trips and falls, 3 clinical incidents, and 2 property-damage incidents. All are already in NIMS.

    Agent: I’ll draft from the template using those figures and align with NIMS. (Produces a full report with executive summary, scope, incident summary table, trends, claims exposure placeholder, mitigation actions, and compliance/next steps.) I’ve run validate_risk_report on the draft — all five expected sections are present.

    You: Our “Claims exposure” section mentions that we sought legal advice on one potential claim. Can you check for anything that should be tagged as privileged?

    Agent: (Runs tag_legal_privilege on the report.) It flagged the “Claims exposure” section because it refers to legal advice. I’ve added a note in that section: “This paragraph is subject to Legal Professional Privilege (LPP); restrict distribution accordingly.” You may want to redact or limit that paragraph before wider circulation.

    Excerpt of a generated document

    The agent produces Risk Management reports from the skill template and SCA references. Below is a condensed excerpt: incident summary table and part of risk mitigation.

    Incident summary and mitigation (excerpt):

    ## 3. Incidents and trends
    
    ### 3.1 Incident summary
    
    | Category / type        | Count | Notes                          |
    |------------------------|-------|--------------------------------|
    | Slips, trips, falls    | 14    | Mostly wards and corridors     |
    | Clinical               | 3     | Two medication; one procedure  |
    | Property damage        | 2     | Equipment and building          |
    
    ### 3.2 Trends and lessons learned
    
    Slips and trips remain the largest category. We have scheduled refresher training and completed a corridor signage review. Clinical incidents are under internal review; findings will feed into the next quarter’s mitigation.
    
    ## 5. Risk mitigation
    
    - Refresher training on slips/trips/falls (Q2).
    - Medication safety checklist rolled out in two wards; full rollout by end Q2.
    - All incidents reported to the State Claims Agency via NIMS in line with statutory requirements.
    

    Extension tools and validations

    The skill includes two tools that run over the report file:

    validate_risk_report

    Checks that the report contains the five expected SCA-style sections:

    SectionWhat is checked
    Executive summaryPresence of executive summary, summary overview, or brief overview wording
    Scope / contextScope/context heading or entity, indemnity scheme, reporting period
    Incidents and trendsIncidents and trends, incident summary, or lessons learned
    Risk mitigationRisk mitigation, mitigation actions, or actions taken/planned
    Compliance / next stepsCompliance/next steps, incident reporting to SCA, or NIMS

    For each section the tool reports [OK] or [MISSING]. The overall result is All expected sections are present or One or more expected sections missing with a list of gaps. Use after drafting or editing so the report is complete before submission.

    Scans the report by section (split by ## / ### headings) and flags content that may be Protected Disclosure (Protected Disclosures Act 2014) or Legal Professional Privilege (LPP):

    • Protected Disclosure: Looks for phrases such as protected disclosure, whistleblow, prescribed person, relevant wrongdoing, disclosure to legal adviser, and similar.
    • LPP: Looks for legal professional privilege, LPP, privileged, legal advice, advice from our lawyers/solicitors/counsel, solicitor-client, without prejudice, litigation privilege, and similar.

    For each flagged section the tool outputs the heading, the tag (Protected Disclosure or Legal Professional Privilege), and a short content snippet. No text is modified; the output is a list to review so the entity can mark or restrict those sections per policy (e.g. redaction or limited distribution).

    Ready to let your expertise drive the workflow?

    Stop wrestling with rigid templates and complex tooling. Write your process in markdown, let the agent handle the rest.

    Get Started