Browse Skills

UK Bribery Act — Adequate Procedures ABC Program

    Get Started with This Skill

    Overview

    Draft and validate the Anti-Bribery & Corruption (ABC) programme documentation required for the ‘adequate procedures’ defence under UK Bribery Act 2010 §7. Structures the programme around the Ministry of Justice’s six principles: proportionate procedures, top-level commitment, risk assessment, due diligence, communication/training, and monitoring/review.

    Example Conversation

    You: We’re a UK engineering firm with contracts in the Middle East and Africa. We need ABC programme documentation for the adequate procedures defence. Can you draft and validate?

    Agent: I’ll draft the ABC programme structured around the six MoJ principles: proportionate procedures for your risk profile, board-level commitment statement, bribery risk assessment by geography and sector, tiered due diligence for agents and JV partners, a training and communication plan, and monitoring/review with a whistleblowing channel. Then I’ll run adequate_procedures_checker.

    Agent: Created abc-programme-draft.md. Running adequate_procedures_checker

    Agent: Check FAIL — the due diligence section mentions DD procedures but lacks risk-based tiers (e.g. standard vs. enhanced DD). Also, no review cadence is specified in the monitoring section. I’ll add tiered DD (standard for low-risk, enhanced for high-risk jurisdictions) and an annual review cycle.

    Agent: Updated and re-ran adequate_procedures_checker: PASS — all six MoJ principles addressed, geographic and sectoral risk factors present, risk-based DD tiers defined, whistleblowing channel described, and annual review cadence specified.

    What the Tools Validate

    The skill includes one extension tool:

    adequate_procedures_checker validates ABC programme documentation across five checks:

    • MoJ six principles coverage — All six principles must be addressed: proportionate procedures, top-level commitment, risk assessment, due diligence, communication/training, and monitoring/review. Reports which are missing.
    • Geographic and sectoral risk factors — The risk assessment must include geographic risk factors (e.g. country risk, CPI ranking, high-risk jurisdictions) and sectoral risk factors (e.g. industry-specific vulnerabilities).
    • Risk-based DD tiers — The due diligence section must include risk-based tiers or categories (e.g. standard/enhanced, low/medium/high risk).
    • Whistleblowing mechanism — A confidential reporting channel, hotline, or speak-up procedure must be described.
    • Monitoring/review cadence — A defined review frequency must be specified (e.g. annual, quarterly).

    Output: Per-check PASS/FAIL with an overall result. For each failing check, the report identifies what is missing or incomplete. Run on the programme draft; fix gaps and re-run until the overall check passes.

    Output Excerpt

    Excerpt from a generated ABC programme and sample checker report.

    ABC programme (excerpt):

    ## 1. Proportionate Procedures
    
    The ABC programme is proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of the organisation's activities and the bribery risks it faces. The risk-based approach prioritises resources on high-risk areas.
    
    ## 3. Risk Assessment
    
    ### Geographic risk
    Operations in jurisdictions with CPI scores below 40 (Transparency International) are classified as high-risk. Current high-risk countries: [list]. All engagements in high-risk jurisdictions require enhanced due diligence.
    
    ### Sectoral risk
    Government contracting and infrastructure projects are classified as elevated sector risk due to public official interaction and subcontracting chains.
    
    ## 4. Due Diligence
    
    | DD Tier | Criteria | Scope |
    |---------|----------|-------|
    | Standard | Low-risk jurisdiction, established counterparty | Basic screening, sanctions check |
    | Enhanced (EDD) | High-risk jurisdiction, government-linked, or agent | Full background check, site visit, ongoing monitoring |
    
    ## 6. Monitoring & Review
    
    Annual review of the ABC programme by the Compliance Committee. Internal audit of high-risk engagements every 12 months. Whistleblowing hotline: [details]. Speak-up reports are investigated within 30 days.
    

    adequate_procedures_checker report (excerpt):

    === MoJ Six Principles Coverage ===
    Result: PASS
    All six MoJ principles are addressed.
    Covered (6/6): 1 (Proportionate Procedures), 2 (Top-Level Commitment), 3 (Risk Assessment), 4 (Due Diligence), 5 (Communication & Training), 6 (Monitoring & Review)
    
    === Risk Assessment — Geographic & Sectoral Factors ===
    Result: PASS
    Risk assessment includes both geographic and sectoral risk factors.
    
    === Due Diligence — Risk-Based Tiers ===
    Result: PASS
    Due diligence section includes risk-based tiers or categories.
    
    === Whistleblowing / Reporting Mechanism ===
    Result: PASS
    Whistleblowing or confidential reporting mechanism is described.
    
    === Monitoring & Review Cadence ===
    Result: PASS
    Monitoring and review section includes a defined review cadence.
    
    OVERALL: PASS — All adequate procedures checks passed.
    

    Getting Started

    Add your source materials to the project workspace (existing ABC policies, risk registers, DD procedures), then activate the UK Bribery Act — Adequate Procedures ABC Program skill. The agent will guide you through risk assessment, policy drafting, DD procedures, training plan, monitoring, and running adequate_procedures_checker to validate the programme against MoJ guidance.

    Ready to let your expertise drive the workflow?

    Stop wrestling with rigid templates and complex tooling. Write your process in markdown, let the agent handle the rest.

    Get Started