140+ GRC skills with built-in validation
7 framework workspace templates
Zero training on your data
Isolated per-project workspaces

Framework Coverage

Choose your framework. Start drafting in minutes.

Each workspace template packages domain-specific skills, reference material, and validation tools for a complete engagement path.

NIST SP 800-53

7 skills 30+ validation checks

FIPS 199 categorization, baseline selection, family policies, control standards, mapping, gap analysis, and CSF crosswalk.

  • Catalog-scale baseline completeness
  • Tailoring justification validation
  • NIST CSF profile authoring

GDPR Compliance

19 skills 50+ validation checks

Dual-track program: EU-wide GDPR gap assessment plus Ireland DPC self-assessment alignment. Covers all 14 compliance domains.

  • ROPA and DPIA automation
  • DPC checklist alignment
  • Consent and LIA validation

ISO 42001 AIMS

18 skills 45+ validation checks

AI Management System from inventory and impact assessment through risk register, data governance, model development, and Annex A SoA.

  • AI-specific risk criteria
  • Bias and drift monitoring checks
  • Responsible AI policy generation

ISO 27701 PIMS

11 skills 30+ validation checks

Privacy Information Management System extending ISO 27001 with PII inventory, controller/processor controls, DPIA program, and privacy SoA.

  • Annex A/B control coverage
  • ROPA data flow mapping
  • Privacy risk assessment

CMMI-DEV

30+ skills

Process improvement across all CMMI-DEV practice areas: causal analysis, configuration management, decision analysis, and organizational process definition.

  • Practice area coverage scoring
  • Maturity level gap analysis
  • Process improvement roadmap

How it compares

Why GRC teams choose Rakenne over generic AI

Generic chatbots produce plausible-sounding text with no structure guarantees. Rakenne runs your compliance process.

Traditional GRC Tools
Generic AI (ChatGPT)
Clause completeness
Traditional GRC Tools Manual checklists — human effort on every review
Generic AI (ChatGPT) No structural awareness — may skip required sections
Cross-document consistency
Traditional GRC Tools Separate Word files — contradictions found late
Generic AI (ChatGPT) Each prompt is isolated — contradictions go unnoticed
Risk-control traceability
Traditional GRC Tools Spreadsheet-based mapping — manual and error-prone
Generic AI (ChatGPT) No linkage between risk register and control narratives
Self-correction
Traditional GRC Tools No self-correction — relies entirely on reviewer
Generic AI (ChatGPT) Errors persist until you catch them manually
Framework-specific references
Traditional GRC Tools Built-in but rigid and hard to customize
Generic AI (ChatGPT) General knowledge, often outdated or imprecise
Reproducibility
Traditional GRC Tools Template-based — consistent structure but manual execution
Generic AI (ChatGPT) Different output each time — copy-paste prompts

See it in action

Validation catches what reviewers miss

Skills include automated checks that run against the output. When something fails, the agent fixes it — no manual back-and-forth.

The agent validates, then self-corrects

In this ISO 27001 example, the agent runs a clause completeness check, discovers a missing mandatory section, fixes the draft, and re-validates — all within the same conversation.

Rakenne Agent
Agent
Draft complete. Let me validate the ISMS documentation set against ISO 27001:2022 requirements.
Agent
Running clause_completeness_check on 14 artifacts…
Agent

FAIL — 1 issue found:

  • Clause 6.1.2: Information security risk assessment — missing mandatory risk acceptance criteria section. Required by Clause 6.1.2(a).
Agent
Adding the risk acceptance criteria section to the risk assessment methodology document. Referencing the risk appetite statement from the organization profile…
Agent
Running clause_completeness_check again…
Agent
PASS — All 14 artifacts validated. 73 clauses covered, 0 gaps remaining. Ready for your review.

Beyond the big frameworks

140+ skills across privacy, financial crime, and industry-specific compliance

The GRC skill library goes far beyond the major frameworks. Browse the full catalog or start with a workspace template.

Privacy & Data Protection

  • CCPA / CPRA
  • Canada PIPEDA
  • UK GDPR & ICO DPIA
  • EU AI Act (FRIA)

Financial Crime

  • AML / BSA Program
  • Nordic AML/CFT
  • AUSTRAC AML/CTF
  • CFPB UDAAP

Industry-Specific

  • ISO 14971 (Medical Devices)
  • ISO 14001 (Environmental)
  • ITAR / EAR (Export Control)
  • AS9100 (Aerospace)

Cross-Framework

Go deeper

Tutorials, use cases, and best practices

Step-by-step guides showing real dialog, tool output, and how skills chain together for each framework.

FAQ

Common questions from GRC practitioners

Auditors evaluate whether evidence is adequate, narratives are accurate, and controls hang together — not which tool produced the first draft. Rakenne’s GRC skills are designed around explicit validation and traceable artifacts. You remain the author of what you deliver; the product reduces mechanical omissions and inconsistency. Many teams position the tool the same way they would a clause library or junior analyst: structure and completeness checks, with senior review on judgment calls.

Yes. Skills reference version-pinned material — for example ISO 27001:2022, NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, and AICPA 2017 TSC. Reference files are bundled with each skill, so the agent works against a known baseline rather than general training data. When standards are updated, the corresponding skills are updated to match.

Absolutely. Every GRC skill is written in plain text — you can fork a skill, add or modify validation rules, change required sections, or adjust the workflow steps. The Skill Workshop template lets you author and test custom skills interactively. No programming required.

Skills in a workspace template are designed to run sequentially. Later skills read the artifacts produced by earlier ones — the risk register, scope statement, organization profile, etc. Validation tools then check cross-references: for example, that every risk in the register maps to a control, and every control appears in the Statement of Applicability. This catches the ‘floating paragraphs’ problem common in multi-document compliance programs.

No. Your prompts, documents, and outputs are processed only to deliver the service and are never used to train foundation models. Each project gets an isolated workspace — no cross-tenant or cross-project access. Data handling and subprocessors are described in our Privacy Policy.

Yes. Skills are reusable packages that you can share across your organization. Customize a workflow once — add your firm’s structure, validation rules, and style guidelines — then roll it out to your team so every engagement starts from a consistent, proven baseline.

Traditional GRC platforms focus on control management, evidence collection, and workflow orchestration — they track your compliance program. Rakenne focuses on document drafting and validation — the actual production of policies, procedures, risk assessments, control narratives, and audit reports. They complement each other: Rakenne produces the artifacts that GRC platforms track.

Ready to draft your first compliance document?

Pick a framework, start a workspace, and see validation in action. No sign-up required.

Ready to let your expertise drive the workflow?

Stop wrestling with rigid templates and generic chatbots. Describe your process, let the agent handle the rest.

Get Started Free — No Sign-Up